首页> 外文OA文献 >Affective bias as a rational response to the statistics of rewards and punishments
【2h】

Affective bias as a rational response to the statistics of rewards and punishments

机译:情感偏见是对奖惩统计的一种理性反应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Affective bias, the tendency to differentially prioritise the processing of negative relative to positive events, is commonly observed in clinical and non-clinical populations. However, why such biases develop is not known. Using a computational framework, we investigated whether affective biases may reflect individuals’ estimates of the information content of negative relative to positive events. During a reinforcement learning task, the information content of positive and negative outcomes was manipulated independently by varying the volatility of their occurrence. Human participants altered the learning rates used for the outcomes selectively, preferentially learning from the most informative. This behaviour was associated with activity of the central norepinephrine system, estimated using pupilometry, for loss outcomes. Humans maintain independent estimates of the information content of distinct positive and negative outcomes which may bias their processing of affective events. Normalising affective biases using computationally inspired interventions may represent a novel approach to treatment development.
机译:在临床人群和非临床人群中,普遍存在情感偏见,即对阴性事件相对于阳性事件进行差异化处理的倾向。然而,为什么会产生这样的偏见尚不清楚。使用计算框架,我们调查了情感偏见是否可以反映个人对负面事件相对于正面事件的信息含量的估计。在强化学习任务中,通过改变正负结果的波动性来独立操纵正负结果的信息内容。人类参与者选择性地改变了用于结果的学习率,优先从信息量最大的人那里学习。这种行为与中枢去甲肾上腺素系统的活动有关,通过瞳孔测量法估计其丧失结果。人类对不同的积极和消极结果的信息内容保持独立的估计,这可能会影响他们对情感事件的处理。使用受计算机启发的干预措施来规范情感偏见可能代表了一种新的治疗方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pulcu, E; Browning, M;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号